Veronique A MetArt
|
There is something very Risque about this nude photo set of Veronique A from Met-Art. She is a stunning babe with a gorgeous face and curves in all the right places. Even the tattoo on her ankle adds to her overall eroticism. Thank you MarK for a great photo set. |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Tags: Mark, Met-Art, Nudes, Veronique-A
on June 12th, 2007 at 6:51 pm
Hello,
It is not MarK, but rather Mark.
Also, describing any of these girls as “gorgeous”, etc., is redundant and rather dim-witted, because, to at least part of the audience, they ALL are gorgeous. Otherwise, they never would have been selected and hired by Met-Art to begin with.
Try reading the descriptions about the women in the “Mac and Bumble” Web site. They babble aimlessly about every one. It is so stupid that I think that the text was written by a computer using a simple program.
Also, what the text says is ignorant. Jenna Jameson is described as an “up-and-coming model”, when she really is a famous & well-established American actress who works cheerfully in pornographic movies! (What we call “fuck-films”, too.)
They babble about what an up-and-coming person Chloe Jones “is”, when poor Chloe, the mother of two small children, passed away from liver disease in the summer of 1995. That sucks when they can’t even recognize that a person is tragically deceased, even though she was also a famous and enthusiastic actress in pornographic films, who did some modeling on the side. As far as I am concerned, since she enjoyed fucking in front of the camera, I have nothing against it. The she retired from that, got married, and started producing a family. She is buried in Houston, Texas, and many of us miss her.
There are women who were the Playmate-of-the-Year in their collection, but yet, no mention is made of that fact.
Other women in their collection are completely unknown as far as I am concerned, yet, they are described as having a large world-wide base of fans. That is bullshit.
Dale
on September 1st, 2007 at 5:59 pm
Desire woman